Salem News Channel

With the stakes rising, the debate over voter ID, election security, and political accountability is taking center stage. Are Americans being given the full picture—and what could it mean for the fight ahead? In Texas, Democratic U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico has said he hates voter ID “with every fiber of his being” and calls it anti-American.

Read More...

A high-profile Democrat’s call to enlarge the Supreme Court—only once her party regains control—points to a wider sequence of institutional changes designed to entrench lasting dominance and sideline constitutional checks.

Read More...

First Lady Melania Trump announced Friday that there will be a ceasefire in the Ukrainian city of Oleshky, as there are possible trilateral talks looming in hopes of ending the Russia-Ukraine war. 

Read More...

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is facing serious questions about her family history after the New York Post published a British marriage certificate that reportedly identifies her father's name as "Nur Said Elmi."

Read More...

In this engaging conversation, the chief political correspondent of the Washington Examiner, Byron York, discusses the final Senate debate in Michigan between former congressman Mike Rogers and Abdul El-Sayed. York highlights the fiery nature of the debate, focusing on the Muslim Brotherhood issue and how it affected voter perceptions of El-Sayed. The discussion also touches on the influence of early voting numbers and the questionable integrity of some polling firms. York and his co-host delve into the implications of President Trump's approval ratings on the upcoming midterm elections, examining both House and Senate races. They speculate on the potential outcomes in key battleground states, offering a nuanced analysis of the political landscape as Election Day approaches.

Read More...

Christian Toto, a prominent writer and commentator, discusses the recent developments in the entertainment industry, including Elon Musk's investment in Skydance and its implications for media ownership. Toto also touches on the cultural battle between conservative and liberal viewpoints in media, referencing controversies surrounding Saturday Night Live and other platforms. The conversation shifts to an upcoming documentary, "Paging Hezbollah," which details a significant counteroffensive by the IDF and Mossad. Toto also previews some of the major films expected to release around the holiday season, highlighting potential Oscar contenders and other notable productions. Throughout, Toto provides insights into the shifting dynamics of Hollywood and the broader entertainment landscape.

Read More...

In a conversation with Will Chamberlain, senior counsel for the Article III Project, the discussion revolves around the recent indictment of Virginia Democrat Louise Lucas. The conversation delves into the brazen actions of Lucas, who allegedly allowed her unindicted co-conspirator to bring $100,000 in cash into her office while she worked with the FBI undercover. The crux of the matter involves serious allegations of fraud and conflict of interest, as Lucas was reportedly setting up a shell company to hide her personal stake in a marijuana business while simultaneously working to steer legislation in Virginia to benefit such ventures. Chamberlain highlights the stark contrast between Lucas’s brazen actions and the more sophisticated corruption depicted in shows like "The Wire." The conversation also touches on the legal intricacies of marijuana sales in Virginia, pointing out that while recreational marijuana is not yet legal, there are strict regulations governing its sale. Lucas's alleged actions include setting up a front company and hiding her personal stake while trying to influence legislation for personal gain. Further into the discussion, the topic shifts to the case of Ilhan Omar, where the Department of Justice believes she entered the U.S. under a false identity. The conversation explores the complexities of her immigration history, including allegations that her father was a colonel in a Marxist regime in Somalia, potentially making him ineligible for refugee status. The conversation speculates on the motivations behind her alleged identity fraud and the broader implications for immigration law and policy. The conversation is rich with legal analysis and insights, providing a detailed examination of the intricate legal and ethical issues surrounding these high-profile cases.

Read More...

Communities across California are pushing to stop the construction of new data centers, arguing that stricter regulations and greater transparency are not enough to address concerns about their impact on neighborhoods and natural resources. The growing opposition comes as technology companies expand data center operations to meet increasing demand for artificial intelligence, cloud computing and other digital services. Residents and community organizations say the facilities can consume significant amounts of electricity and water, potentially straining local infrastructure and contributing to higher utility costs. Some communities are also raising concerns about noise, air pollution and the amount of land required for large-scale developments. In Southern California, several cities have already taken steps to restrict or prohibit new data centers. Monterey Park became one of the first California cities to adopt a permanent ban following opposition to a proposed facility near residential neighborhoods. Voters also approved a measure supporting the prohibition. Coachella followed with its own ban on large-scale data centers after months of community protests and public meetings. Other cities, including Palm Springs and Gilroy, have approved temporary moratoriums to give local officials time to study potential environmental and infrastructure impacts before allowing additional projects. The debate is also expanding into Northern California, where San Francisco officials have considered temporarily halting new data center approvals while reviewing existing regulations. In San Diego, Mayor Todd Gloria signed an executive order Thursday directing city officials to advance a proposed temporary moratorium on new data center development. The proposal is scheduled for City Council consideration Monday, October 26. Gloria said the city needs to evaluate potential impacts on water supplies, electricity demand, housing opportunities and surrounding neighborhoods before establishing permanent regulations. Supporters of data center development argue that the facilities can generate construction jobs, tax revenue and investment while supporting the technology infrastructure needed for artificial intelligence and other industries. However, opponents question whether those economic benefits outweigh the potential long-term costs to residents. Community advocates have also expressed concerns that new regulations could still allow projects to move forward despite local opposition. The debate highlights a growing challenge for California officials as they attempt to balance technological development with environmental protections, infrastructure demands and community concerns. With more cities considering bans and temporary restrictions, the future of large-scale data center development in California remains uncertain.

Read More...

President Donald Trump says Google CEO Sundar Pichai rejected his suggestion to rename the Atlantic Ocean, despite the company's previous decisions to adopt new names for two other bodies of water. Speaking at a campaign rally in South Carolina Wednesday, Trump told supporters he had discussed the possibility of renaming the Atlantic Ocean after himself or the United States. The president said he contacted Pichai to ask whether Google Maps would support the proposed change. According to Trump's account, Pichai declined the request, explaining that renaming an ocean would be more complicated than changing the names of smaller bodies of water. Trump quoted Pichai as saying oceans are different because they span multiple countries and asking the president not to pursue the change. The president appeared willing to abandon the idea, telling supporters he would probably leave the Atlantic Ocean's name unchanged. Google has not publicly confirmed Trump's account of the conversation. The remarks follow two previous geographical name changes during Trump's second term. In January 2025, Trump signed an executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America for federal government use. He later signed another order in August 2026 renaming Lake Ontario as Lake America, a move that drew criticism from Canadian officials. Google Maps subsequently adopted both names for users in the United States, while users in other countries continued to see different labels depending on their locations. The changes prompted debate over the authority of individual governments to rename geographical features shared with other countries. Unlike a lake or gulf, the Atlantic Ocean borders numerous countries across North America, South America, Europe and Africa. While the U.S. government can establish geographical names for federal use, those decisions do not require other countries or private companies to adopt the same terminology. During Wednesday's rally, Trump also floated the possibility of renaming the Pacific Ocean, suggesting it could be called the American Ocean. However, no formal executive order has been announced to rename either ocean. For now, the Atlantic Ocean will retain its longstanding name, with Trump indicating he is unlikely to pursue the proposal further.

Read More...

New York City's horse-drawn carriage industry is coming to an end after the City Council voted Thursday to ban the longstanding Central Park attraction. The council approved the legislation in a 40-7 vote, with two members abstaining. The measure, known as Romanch's Law, would phase out horse-drawn carriage operations throughout the city by June 1, 2028. The legislation follows the death of 18-year-old Romanch Mahajan, a tourist from India who was killed in June after being thrown from a horse-drawn carriage in Central Park. According to investigators, the horse bolted, causing the carriage to collide with another carriage and overturn. Mahajan's death renewed concerns about the safety of carriage rides in one of the city's most popular tourist destinations. The legislation is named in his honor. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani supports the ban and has indicated he intends to sign the measure into law. Supporters of the legislation, including animal welfare organizations and Central Park advocates, argue that horse-drawn carriages pose safety risks to passengers, pedestrians and the animals themselves. However, the decision has drawn strong opposition from carriage drivers and business owners who say the ban threatens their livelihoods and a tradition dating back more than 160 years. The Transport Workers Union, which represents approximately 150 carriage drivers, has threatened an immediate legal challenge. Union representatives argue that the legislation could deprive carriage owners of their businesses and operating licenses without adequate compensation. The measure requires the city to establish a workforce transition program to assist affected employees. The program would include job training, career counseling and assistance finding new employment. City officials must develop the transition plan by April 2027. The legislation also calls for consideration of financial compensation for carriage operators. The bill includes provisions intended to ensure the humane treatment and placement of carriage horses as the industry winds down. It prohibits selling the animals for slaughter. President Donald Trump also criticized the decision, describing horse-drawn carriage rides as a longstanding New York tradition and questioning why the city would eliminate the industry following an accident. The legislation now heads to Mamdani for his signature. If enacted, the ban will bring an end to one of Central Park's most recognizable attractions while setting up a potential legal battle over the future of the industry.

Read More...

President Donald Trump is once again raising the possibility of seeking a third term in the White House, telling supporters at a rally in Iowa Thursday night that he believes he has the right to run again. Speaking at Sioux Gateway Airport in Sioux City, Trump discussed the possibility of another presidential campaign while addressing supporters ahead of the November 3 midterm elections. The president acknowledged that the Constitution appears to prohibit him from seeking another term but argued that his disputed claims about the 2020 election justify another run. "I think I have the right to run again because they cheated," Trump told the crowd, referring to his longstanding allegations that the 2020 presidential election was rigged. Trump has repeatedly disputed the outcome of the 2020 election, which he lost to former President Joe Biden. However, allegations of widespread fraud sufficient to change the election's outcome have not been substantiated. The 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits anyone from being elected president more than twice. Trump was first elected in 2016 and returned to the White House following his victory in 2024. His latest comments renew questions about whether he intends to pursue another presidential campaign in 2028, despite the constitutional restriction. Trump has previously floated the idea of serving a third term, at times joking about the possibility during campaign appearances and referencing merchandise promoting a potential 2028 run. Thursday's remarks came during a campaign stop intended to rally Republican voters ahead of the midterms. The president appeared alongside Republican Rep. Ashley Hinson, who is running for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Joni Ernst. Trump encouraged supporters to vote Republican in November, framing the upcoming elections as an opportunity to continue his administration's agenda. While the president has not announced a formal campaign for 2028, his comments in Iowa have once again brought the constitutional limits on presidential terms into focus.

Read More...

A Queens mother has been charged with murder in the death of her 25-year-old son with autism, who was found with severe knife wounds inside their family home last week. The victim, identified as Bryan Wong, was discovered Wednesday, October 14, inside the family's residence on 59th Street in Woodside, Queens. According to investigators, Wong's father discovered his son unresponsive on a couch in the living room. Wong had suffered cuts to his neck and wrists and was pronounced dead at the scene. Wong was nonverbal and had autism. Neighbors said his mother served as his primary caregiver and was frequently seen accompanying him around the neighborhood. Investigators recovered several knives from the residence, including one in the living room and others in a bathroom. Authorities also reportedly discovered a note believed to have been written by Wong's mother, raising suspicions about her involvement in his death. Hours before Wong's body was discovered, his mother was found seriously injured beneath an overpass along the Van Wyck Expressway in Flushing. Police believe she jumped from the overpass in an apparent suicide attempt. She survived but suffered multiple fractures, including injuries to her pelvis and leg. She was transported to NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital for treatment. Investigators subsequently focused on the mother as a suspect in her son's death. The case has shocked neighbors, many of whom described the family as quiet and said they had watched Wong grow up in the community. Several residents said Wong's mother appeared devoted to caring for her son, although some recalled seeing her under considerable stress. The circumstances surrounding Wong's death remain under investigation, including what may have led to the fatal attack. The murder charge marks a significant development in the investigation, which began after the discovery of Wong's body last week. The allegations against his mother have not been proven in court.

Read More...

This episode of the podcast is a must-listen for anyone following the latest developments in the world of politics. Representative Ilhan Omar's recent interview with Chris Hayes has left many questions unanswered, and the speaker is here to break it down. From allegations of immigration fraud to a dramatic change in her financial situation, this episode is packed with explosive revelations that will keep you on the edge of your seat. The speaker dives into the details of Ilhan Omar's financial situation, pointing out the discrepancy between her initial report of a $30 million net worth and her current claim of living paycheck to paycheck. The speaker questions how this sudden change in financial status could have occurred, especially considering her husband's involvement in a venture capitalist firm. The conversation also touches on the recent raid on Ilhan Omar's D.C. residence, which has left many wondering what's next for the congresswoman. The speaker shares their thoughts on the recent events, pointing out the inconsistencies in Ilhan Omar's story and the potential implications of her actions. They also discuss the role of the Department of Homeland Security and the ongoing investigation into immigration fraud. With so many questions still unanswered, this episode is a must-listen for anyone looking for the latest scoop on this developing story. If you want to stay up-to-date on the latest news and analysis, tune in to this episode to hear the speaker's take on the Ilhan Omar saga. With their unique perspective and sharp insights, you won't want to miss this thought-provoking conversation. Follow Carl Jackson: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow Website: http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com Store: https://CarlJacksonStore.com

Read More...

Dinesh D'Souza joins Greg Laurie to discuss his new book, The Stones Cry Out, a three-year project surveying 150 years of biblical archaeology. Dinesh walks through artifacts that corroborate Scripture down to minor details—the ossuary of Caiaphas, the Balaam inscription in Jordan, the rediscovered Pools of Bethesda and Siloam, and why the Church of the Holy Sepulchre remains the most defensible site of the crucifixion. The conversation widens to the Dead Sea Scrolls arriving one year before Israel's founding, the reasons socialism appeals to a generation disillusioned by crony capitalism, and why most atheism is personal before it is intellectual. Dinesh and Greg also push back on Calvinist determinism, arguing that free response is essential to a relational faith. Lighter moments cover Reagan's ranch, Nixon over breakfast, and fried bananas.

Read More...

Larry Elder discusses the assertion that Donald Trump is labeled as racist because he criticizes certain black politicians, specifically naming Jasmine Crockett and Maxine Waters. Elder argues that Trump's criticisms are directed at left-wing Democrats who have been unfair to him, rather than being rooted in racism. He contrasts Trump's approach with the perceived silence from Democrats on issues such as the surge of illegal immigrants crossing the southern border and the state of the economy. Elder praises Trump's handling of international relations, particularly with Iran and Russia, asserting that Trump's actions have prevented Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb and secured the release of an American prisoner held in Russia. He criticizes the media for focusing disproportionately on Trump's demeanor while neglecting significant events like the border crisis and economic indicators.

Read More...

Read More...

This video discusses findings from an investigation into elementary school curricula in Berkeley, California, and Philadelphia. The investigation, led by a representative named Tim Wahlberg, examined three school districts and revealed a pattern of left-wing bias influencing how young children are taught subjects such as history, reading, geography, and economics. Teachers and union leaders reportedly discourage sharing these lessons with parents. In Berkeley, students are taught using a book that omits Israel from Middle East maps and describes terms like "Intifada" as positive. Curriculum topics include defining covert and overt resistance and the relationship between capitalism, imperialism, and exploitation. The investigation raises concerns about the ideological perspectives being introduced to young children and the potential impact on their understanding of history and social issues.

Read More...

Read More...

Read More...

In this segment from The Right View with Lara Trump, the discussion centers on allegations that Jack Smith, the prosecutor leading an investigation into a former U.S. president, had compiled a detailed list of Republican supporters and donors. The conversation explores the implications of such actions, questioning the motivations and potential misuse of such personal data by government officials. The panel also touches on the Southern Poverty Law Center's controversial list of conservative figures, drawing parallels between perceived threats to civil liberties and historical instances of government overreach. This dialogue highlights concerns over the weaponization of government agencies to target political opponents and the broader impact on American society and democratic norms.

Read More...